Select Page

 

By Laura Anthony, Esq.

 

Introduction

One of the largest areas of my firms practice involves going public transactions.  I have written extensively on the various going public methods, including IPO/DPOs and reverse mergers.  The topic never loses relevancy, and those considering a transaction always ask about the differences between, and advantages and disadvantages of, both reverse mergers and direct and initial public offerings.  This blog is an updated new edition of past articles on the topic.

Over the past decade the small-cap reverse merger, initial public offering (IPO) and direct public offering (DPO) markets diminished greatly.  The decline was a result of both regulatory changes and economic changes.  In particular, briefly, those reasons were:  (1) the recent Great Recession; (2) backlash from a series of fraud allegations, Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) enforcement actions, and trading suspensions of Chinese companies following reverse mergers; (3) the 2008 Rule 144 amendments, including the prohibition of use of the rule for shell company and former shell company shareholders; (4) problems clearing penny stocks with broker-dealers and FINRA’s enforcement of broker-dealer and clearinghouse due diligence requirements related to penny stocks; (5) DTC scrutiny and difficulty in obtaining clearance following a reverse merger or other corporate restructuring and, significantly, DTC chills and locks; (6) increasing costs of reporting requirements, including XBRL requirements;  (7) the updated seasoning requirements imposed by NYSE, AMEX and NASDAQ, including a twelve-month waiting period prior to qualifying for listing following a reverse merger; (8) the enactment of the Order Handling Rules in 1997; (9) Regulation ATS in 1998; (10) the enactment of Decimalization in 2001; (11) Sarbanes Oxley in 2002; and (12) Regulation NMS in 2006.

 

Going Public Transactions For Smaller Companies: Direct Public Offering And Reverse Merger (Part 1)

The fact is that the vast majority of new jobs in the U.S. are created by early-stage enterprises, and the ability to access capital markets is critical to the growth and sustainability to these enterprises.

 

However, despite all of the adversity to small businesses going public, the U.S.’s optimistic, entrepreneurial, capitalist nature forges forward and with the enactment of the JOBS Act in 2012 and continued political pressure in support of small business capital formation, the reverse merger and IPO/DPO market has been making a slow and steady comeback.

The fact is that the vast majority of new jobs in the U.S. are created by early-stage enterprises, and the ability to access capital markets is critical to the growth and sustainability to these enterprises.  To the contrary, mature enterprises engaging in mergers and acquisitions tend to reduce jobs as they realize economies of scale and eliminate duplicate jobs and functions within the merged entities or even close down underperforming divisions altogether.

 

Going Public Transactions For Smaller Companies: Direct Public Offering And Reverse Merger (Part 1)

The importance of supporting small business capital formation and going public transactions to the general health of the U.S. economy and job creation.

 

Both Congress and the SEC recognize the importance of supporting small business capital formation and going public transactions to the general health of the U.S. economy and job creation.  In addition to the enactment of the JOBS Act, the SEC created the SEC Advisory Committee on Small and Emerging Growth Companies to provide advice on SEC rules, regulations and policies regarding “its mission of protecting investors, maintaining fair, orderly and efficient markets and facilitating capital formation” as related to “(i) capital raising by emerging privately held small businesses and publicly traded companies with less than $250 million in public market capitalization; (ii) trading in the securities of such businesses and companies; and (iii) public reporting and corporate governance requirements to which such businesses and companies are subject.”

In addition, both the SEC and Congress are exploring and supportive of Venture Exchanges (see my articles Here and Here.)  Various other analytical studies and programs have been initiated as well, including the new pilot tick size program, a summary of which can be read Here.

 

Going Public Transactions For Smaller Companies: Direct Public Offering And Reverse Merger (Part 1)

At least in the USA, the stock market, day traders, public market activity and the interest in capital markets will never go away; they will just evolve to meet ever-changing demands and regulations.

 

Moreover, the general economy has improved; the backlash from the Chinese company reverse merger issues has dissipated; although still an issue, many have found workarounds to the Rule 144 issues using Section 4(a)(1) and 4(a)(1½) exemptions; and DTC chills have become less problematic as the DTC has established usable pre-notice and corrective procedures for issuers.

Despite difficulties, the fact is that going public is and remains the best way to access capital markets.  Public companies will always be able to attract a PIPE investor, equity line or similar financing (the costs and quality of these financing opportunities is beyond the scope of this blog).  For cash-poor companies, the use of a trading valuable stock as currency is the only alternative for short-term growth and acquisitions and the attraction of key executives.  At least in the USA, the stock market, day traders, public market activity and the interest in capital markets will never go away; they will just evolve to meet ever-changing demands and regulations.

 

Reverse Mergers

A reverse merger is the most common alternative to an initial public offering (IPO) or direct public offering (DPO) for a company seeking to go public.  A “reverse merger” is a process whereby a privately held company goes public by acquiring a controlling interest in, and merging with, a public operating or public shell company.  The SEC defines a “shell company” as a publically traded company with (1) no or nominal operations and (2) either no or nominal assets or assets consisting solely of any amount of cash and cash equivalents.

A public entity seeks a reverse merger with a private company for a variety of reasons.  Pragmatically, it is common for a business, public or private, to fail to succeed, or fully succeed, in its planned business.  When a public company business fails, there remains an intrinsic value in the public entity, including a shareholder base, trading symbol, trading history, either current or historical audited financial statements for reporting entities, and public filings and accordingly, instead of the business just shutting down as it would in the private world, the public company finds a new business venture and generally new management.  Although in a reverse merger the existing public shareholder base is greatly diluted, those shareholders have an opportunity to recoup some or all of their investment in the new business enterprise, whereas if the business simply shut down, there would be a complete loss.

 

Going Public Transactions For Smaller Companies: Direct Public Offering And Reverse Merger (Part 1)

The private operating company shareholders exchange their shares of the private company for either new or existing shares of the public company so that at the end of the transaction

 

In a reverse merger process, the private operating company shareholders exchange their shares of the private company for either new or existing shares of the public company so that at the end of the transaction, the shareholders of the private operating company own a majority of the public company and the private operating company has become a wholly owned subsidiary of the public company.  The public company assumes the operations of the private operating company.  That is, at the closing, the private operating company has gone public by acquiring a controlling interest in a public company and having the public company assume operations of the private operating entity.

A reverse merger is often structured as a reverse triangular merger.  In that case, the public shell forms a new subsidiary which merges with the private operating business.  At the closing the private company shareholders exchange their ownership for shares in the public company, and the private operating business becomes a wholly owned subsidiary of the public company.  The primary benefit of the reverse triangular merger is the ease of shareholder consent.  That is because the sole shareholder of the acquisition subsidiary is the public company; the directors of the public company can approve the transaction on behalf of the acquiring subsidiary, avoiding the necessity of meeting the proxy requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

In addition, many companies engage in capital restructuring (such as a reverse split) and a name change either prior to or immediately following a reverse merger, but it is not required.

Like any transaction involving the sale of securities, the issuance of securities to the private company shareholders must either be registered under Section 5 of the Securities Act or there must be an available exemption from registration.  Generally, the public company relies on Section 4(a)(2) or Rule 506(b) of Regulation D under the Securities Act for such exemption.

 

Advantages of a Reverse Merger

The primary advantage of a reverse merger is that it can be completed very quickly.  As long as the private entity has its “ducks in a row,” a reverse merger can be completed as quickly as the attorneys can complete the paperwork.  Having your “ducks in a row” includes having completed audited financial statements for the prior two fiscal years and reviewed financial statements for quarters up to date (or from inception if the company is less than two years old), and having the information that will be necessary to file with the SEC readily available.  If the public company is a shell, the SEC requires that a public company file Form 10 type information on the private entity within four days of completing the reverse merger transaction (a super 8-K).  If the public company is operating, the SEC requires only a closing 8-K within four days and the financial statements of the acquired private entity must be filed within 71 days of the closing 8-K.  Upon completion of the reverse merger transaction, the once private company is now public.

The reverse merger transaction itself is not a capital-raising transaction, and accordingly, many private entities complete a capital-raising transaction (such as a PIPE) simultaneously with or immediately following the reverse merger, but it is certainly not required. Raising money is difficult and much more so in the pre-public stages.  Companies that may be less mature in their development and unable to attract sophisticated capital financing can use a reverse merger to complete a going public transaction and still benefit from being public while they grow and mature.  Such benefits include the ability to use stock and stock option plans to attract and keep higher-level executives and consultants and to make growth acquisitions using stock as currency.

Another benefit is the existence of a shareholder base.  A shareholder base is necessary for any company to have active trading and attractive liquidity in its stock.  The more shareholders, generally the more active the trading in a stock and the less volatile the stock price will be from ordinary buying and selling pressures.  In addition, a minimum number of shareholders (generally 300) is necessary to qualify to list on an exchange such as NASDAQ.  Also, existing shareholders are often an overlooked but great source for capital raises via shareholder rights offerings.

 

Going Public Transactions For Smaller Companies: Direct Public Offering And Reverse Merger (Part 1)

the newly public company will have all the benefits of being public, including the ability to use stock and stock option plans to attract and keep higher-level executives

 

Another benefit is the existence of a trading symbol.  Generally in an IPO process, a trading symbol is not issued until the S-1 process has been completed and closed out and a market maker completes a 15c2-11 process with FINRA.  The 211 process can be lengthy.  A trading symbol is a necessary precondition to a secondary trading market and a precondition for many active capital investors.

Similarly a trading history can be seen as beneficial.  Although really any pre-reverse merger trading history should not be indicative of future trading activity, it does show how active the public vehicle shareholder base is, and experience shows that it is easier for an active trading market to develop where one has previously existed.

Finally, since a reverse merger is a going public transaction, the newly public company will have all the benefits of being public, including the ability to use stock and stock option plans to attract and keep higher-level executives, use stock as currency to make acquisitions and of course to access capital markets and capital investors.

 

Disadvantages of a Reverse Merger

There are several disadvantages of a reverse merger.  The primary disadvantage is the restriction on the use of Rule 144 where the public company is or ever has been a shell company.  That is, Rule 144 is unavailable for the use by shareholders of any company that is or was at any time previously a shell company unless certain conditions are met.  In order to use Rule 144, a company must have ceased to be a shell company; be subject to the reporting requirements of section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act; filed all reports and other materials required to be filed by section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act, as applicable, during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the issuer was required to file such reports and materials), other than Form 8-K reports; and have filed current “Form 10 information” with the Commission reflecting its status as an entity that is no longer a shell company and one year must have elapsed after the filing of the Form 10 information.

Rule 144 affects any company who was ever in its history a shell company by subjecting them to additional restrictions when investors sell unregistered stock under Rule 144.  Under Rule 144, a company that ever reported as a shell must be current in its filings with the SEC and have been current for the preceding 12 months before investors can sell unregistered shares.

 

Going Public Transactions For Smaller Companies: Direct Public Offering And Reverse Merger (Part I)

Under Rule 144, a company that ever reported as a shell must be current in its filings with the SEC and have been current for the preceding 12 months before investors can sell unregistered shares.

 

The second biggest disadvantage concerns undisclosed liabilities, lawsuits or other issues with the public shell.  Accordingly, due diligence is an important aspect of the reverse merger process, even when dealing with a fully reporting current public shell.  The second primary disadvantage is that the reverse merger is not a capital-raising transaction (whereas an IPO or DPO is).  An entity in need of capital will still be in need of capital following a reverse merger, although generally, capital-raising transactions are much easier to access once public.  The third primary disadvantage is immediate cost.  The private entity generally must pay for the public shell with cash, equity or a combination of both.  However, it should be noted that an IPO or DPO is also costly.

Another disadvantage is a trading history, which can be both an advantage and disadvantage – an inactive or volatile trading history may repeat itself.

In addition, the NYSE, NYSE MKT (formerly AMEX) and NASDAQ exchanges have enacted more stringent listing requirements for companies seeking to become listed following a reverse merger with a shell company.  The rule change prohibits a reverse merger company from applying to list until the combined entity had traded in the U.S. over-the-counter market, on another national securities exchange, or on a regulated foreign exchange for at least one year following the filing of all required information about the reverse merger transaction, including audited financial statements.  In addition, new rules require that the new reverse merger company has filed all of its required reports for the one-year period, including at least one annual report.  The new rule requires that the reverse merger company “maintain a closing stock price equal to the stock price requirement applicable to the initial listing standard under which the reverse merger company is qualifying to list for a sustained period of time, but in no event for less than 30 of the most recent 60 trading days prior to the filing of the initial listing application.” The rule includes some exceptions for companies that complete a firm commitment offering resulting in net proceeds of at least $40 million.

Next, FINRA can be very difficult when applying for a new trading symbol following a reverse merger, and concurrently with obtaining a new symbol or completing a name change, the DTC will want an updated eligibility letter, which may not be able to be rendered if the public vehicle was a shell.

Finally, whether an entity seeks to go public through a reverse merger or an IPO, they will be subject to several, and ongoing, time-sensitive filings with the SEC and will thereafter be subject to the disclosure and reporting requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

 

Note 1:  Read Part II of this Article. Click HERE
Note 2:  Original appeared on Legal & Compliance, LLC on 30 June 2015.   Click HERE

 

laura1.1 (2)Securities attorney Laura Anthony is the founding partner of Legal & Compliance, LLC, a corporate, securities and business transactions law firm.  The firm’s experienced legal team provides ongoing corporate counsel to small and mid-size private companies, OTC and exchange traded issuers as well as private companies going public on the NASDAQ, NYSE MKT or over-the-counter market, such as the OTCQB and OTCQX. For nearly two decades Legal & Compliance, LLC has served clients providing fast, personalized, cutting-edge legal service.  The firm’s reputation and relationships provide invaluable resources to clients including introductions to investment bankers, broker-dealers, institutional investors and other strategic alliances.

Subscribe Now to Stay Updated

* indicates required






×